<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing! Makes Searching For Intranet Tweets Even Easier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intranetexperience.com/ourblog/2009/11/bing-makes-searching-for-intranet-tweets-even-easier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intranetexperience.com/ourblog/2009/11/bing-makes-searching-for-intranet-tweets-even-easier/</link>
	<description>Topics relating to Intranets, portals, enterprise content management, internal communications, and social media in the workplace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:25:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean R. Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://www.intranetexperience.com/ourblog/2009/11/bing-makes-searching-for-intranet-tweets-even-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean R. Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intranetexperience.com/ourblog/?p=672#comment-649</guid>
		<description>The biggest failing I have seen so far with the Bing! Twitter interface is the mishandling of tags. Having two windows open, side-by-side with &quot;intranet&quot; in one window and &quot;#intranet&quot; in the other clearly shows that Bing! treats these two keywords very differently. Since I can&#039;t create a Bing! search of &quot;intranet OR #intranet&quot; like I can in Tweetdeck, it looks like Bing! is going to need to work on the interface a bit.

Thanks for the comment!

--Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest failing I have seen so far with the Bing! Twitter interface is the mishandling of tags. Having two windows open, side-by-side with &#8220;intranet&#8221; in one window and &#8220;#intranet&#8221; in the other clearly shows that Bing! treats these two keywords very differently. Since I can&#8217;t create a Bing! search of &#8220;intranet OR #intranet&#8221; like I can in Tweetdeck, it looks like Bing! is going to need to work on the interface a bit.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
<p>&#8211;Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Richards</title>
		<link>http://www.intranetexperience.com/ourblog/2009/11/bing-makes-searching-for-intranet-tweets-even-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intranetexperience.com/ourblog/?p=672#comment-648</guid>
		<description>Have tried out the new Bing Twitter search for a little while now. Must say I am a little dissapointed. The updates seem to be a little slow and the search results do not seem as extensive or accurate as TweetDeck. A lot of tweets being missed. Will give it another couple of days testing to see if there is any observed improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have tried out the new Bing Twitter search for a little while now. Must say I am a little dissapointed. The updates seem to be a little slow and the search results do not seem as extensive or accurate as TweetDeck. A lot of tweets being missed. Will give it another couple of days testing to see if there is any observed improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
